We are resonding to complaint above which is his real name and not Ted whose address is. We have recorded all of his calls and he has not meet the maintenence requiremnents to have the vehicle repaired, but he did go through the effort to manufacture maintenence receipts to suit his needs, but upon further inspection of his documentation the facility is not open on Sunsays as one of the receipts that he made and the others DO NOT EXIST at that facility and were verified by that facility, Its great to complain but better not to utter and publish documents and commit wirew fraud in an attaempt to get what you want by any means.read our response to on of the agencies that h has sent a letter to so far, we have mmade a report with the proper authorites based on his actions.
Also we have recordings of Gregory’s calls to our offices; he has called numerous times and has made defamatory statements about myself as well as stating that he is going to destroy me and my family. He also made numerous statements that he spoke personally with the Michigan AG’s office and went on to make wild accusations in regard to his conversations with that office and the others listed, unfortunately when we pointed out to Gregory that when in fact he had clamed to talk to those offices, they were closed in observance of Veterans Day. He had admitted that he did in fact lie about that.
The statements that he has made insinuated hate crimes in regard to the descriptive adjectives of my sexual preferences towards the liking of other men and the ultimate destruction of me and my family. The various authorities are being notified in regard to this matter, based on the safety of the individuals that Gregory has made defamatory comments about.
Now to address Gregory’s unsubstantiated claims that he was wrongfully denied, the first item that needs to be addressed is the forging of documents in an attempt to defraud/induce a person or company to pay a claim in excess of $1, 000 which is a Felony.
Attached are the documents that we received from Gregory directly via fax, based on our research and the actual documents from the facility where Gregory claims to have had this work additional work completed Gregory’s documents are forged. Also attached is the description of what constitutes wire fraud.
Gregory claims that he had 5 oil changes performed at the A&A 15 Minute Lube & Oil change facility in Moline IL, when in reality on 2 were completed and verifiable from the location, he had the document that he manufactured faxed to our office on Nov 4, 2009 As you can clearly see on the right side of the document from Gregory that has the name of the facility cut off, he claims in this document that there is a previous service history at this facility for the vehicle in question, upon a further review of these alleged service dates it was discovered that these are in fact false and this document is forged to suit Gregory’s vehicle maintenance requirements for making a claim.
All of the dates except for the last one of 11/09/2009 were manufactured by Gregory. The date of 5-28-2009 is interesting as it was entered by Gregory because a copy of the original document with ticket number 10687 is attached for your review that states that he actually had the required maintenance done on 5-21-2009 not on 5-28-2009 a week later as he claims.
The service dates of 4-3-2009, 5-28-2009, 7-12-2009, 9-18-2009 do not exist at this facility for Gregory only the last date of 11-3-2009 is actual that is on this manufactured document. The date of 7-12-2009 is a Sunday as well and they are not open on Sundays. Could Gregory be any more arrogant in his fraudulent pursuit of self-righteousness?
Clearly Gregory has met all of the requirements for having his warranty cancelled, according to the terms and conditions that he signed and agreed to on 2-4-2009 in Section 6 of his agreement it gives the Administrator the right of cancellation based on these facts. A copy of the agreement is attached for your review as well. Gregory has also met the criteria for wire fraud and we will be forwarding these documents to the proper authorities for review of these facts.
As far as addressing any of Gregory’s claims for repairs he has not met the minimum requirements for a claim to proceed.